↓ Skip to main content

Substrate-Dependence of Competitive Nucleotide Pyrophosphatase/Phosphodiesterase1 (NPP1) Inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Substrate-Dependence of Competitive Nucleotide Pyrophosphatase/Phosphodiesterase1 (NPP1) Inhibitors
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang-Yong Lee, Soumya Sarkar, Sanjay Bhattarai, Vigneshwaran Namasivayam, Steven De Jonghe, Holger Stephan, Piet Herdewijn, Ali El-Tayeb, Christa E. Müller

Abstract

Nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase type 1 (NPP1) is a membrane glycoprotein involved in the hydrolysis of extracellular nucleotides. Its major substrate is ATP which is converted to AMP and diphosphate. NPP1 was proposed as a new therapeutic target in brain cancer and immuno-oncology. Several NPP1 inhibitors have been reported to date, most of which were evaluated vs. the artificial substrate p-nitrophenyl 5'-thymidine monophosphate (p-Nph-5'-TMP). Recently, we observed large discrepancies in inhibitory potencies for a class of competitive NPP1 inhibitors when tested vs. the artificial substrate p-Nph-5'-TMP as compared to the natural substrate ATP. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to investigate whether inhibitors of human NPP1 generally display substrate-dependent inhibitory potency. Systematic evaluation of nucleotidic as well as non-nucleotidic NPP1 inhibitors revealed significant differences in determined Ki values for competitive, but not for non- and un-competitive inhibitors when tested vs. the frequently used artificial substrate p-Nph-5'-TMP as compared to ATP. Allosteric modulation of NPP1 by p-Nph-5'-TMP may explain these discrepancies. Results obtained using the AMP derivative p-nitrophenyl 5'-adenosine monophosphate (p-Nph-5'-AMP) as an alternative artificial substrate correlated much better with those employing the natural substrate ATP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,272,754
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,069
of 16,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,892
of 454,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#48
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.