↓ Skip to main content

Immune Checkpoint in Glioblastoma: Promising and Challenging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immune Checkpoint in Glioblastoma: Promising and Challenging
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Huang, Fangkun Liu, Zhixiong Liu, Hui Tang, Haishan Wu, Qianni Gong, Jindong Chen

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a severe malignant brain cancer with poor overall survival. Conventional intervention remains dismal to prevent recurrence and deterioration of GBM cell. Recent years have witnessed exciting breakthroughs in novel immune strategies, especially checkpoint inhibitors, some of which have become adjuvant setting after standard of care in melanoma. Several clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitors are ongoing in glioblastoma and other brain carcinomas. Plus, synergistic combinations of checkpoint inhibitors with conventional therapy strategies-radiotherapy, temozolomide, bevacizumab, and corticosteroids are now being exploited and applied in clinical settings. This review highlights the recent developments of checkpoints in GBM immunotherapy to provide a brief and comprehensive review of current treatment options. Furthermore, we will discuss challenges remained, such as unique immune system of central nervous system (CNS), immune-related toxicities, synergies, and adverse interactions of combination therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 186 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Master 21 11%
Other 13 7%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 48 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Neuroscience 17 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 6%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,425,138
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,634
of 17,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,642
of 313,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#46
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.