↓ Skip to main content

New Frontiers in the Pathobiology and Treatment of Cancer Regimen-Related Mucosal Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Frontiers in the Pathobiology and Treatment of Cancer Regimen-Related Mucosal Injury
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00354
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marika Cinausero, Giuseppe Aprile, Paola Ermacora, Debora Basile, Maria G. Vitale, Valentina Fanotto, Giuseppe Parisi, Lorenzo Calvetti, Stephen T. Sonis

Abstract

Mucositis is a common complication of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted agents. It often affects compliance to anticancer therapies as it frequently causes schedule delays, interruptions or discontinuations of treatment. Moreover, the economic impact related to the management of mucositis is topical and several estimations of additional hospital costs due to this clinical condition have been recently reported. The ability to determine risk factors for mucositis, to early detect its onset, to assess correctly the degree of this toxicity and to plan its multidisciplinary management are all key elements to guarantee the quality of life of patients and to avoid useless dose reduction or interruption of treatment. The pathogenesis of mucositis is multifactorial and it is classily subdivided into oral and gastrointestinal mucositis according to its anatomic presentation. Treatment and patients' related factors might help in predicting the frequency and the potential degree of symptoms onset. Here we discuss about clinical presentation and pathogenesis of mucositis in relation to different kinds of treatments. Moreover, we focus on therapeutic and prevention strategies, describing past and present management according to international guidelines and the most promising new data about agents potentially able to further improve the treatment of mucositis in the next future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 309 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 13%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Student > Postgraduate 13 4%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 104 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 117 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#17,898,929
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#7,158
of 16,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,975
of 317,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#123
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,262 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.