↓ Skip to main content

An Overview on Medicinal Chemistry of Synthetic and Natural Derivatives of Cannabidiol

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
patent
8 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Overview on Medicinal Chemistry of Synthetic and Natural Derivatives of Cannabidiol
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00422
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Morales, Patricia H. Reggio, Nadine Jagerovic

Abstract

Cannabidiol (CBD) has been traditionally used in Cannabis-based preparation, however historically, it has received far less interest as a single drug than the other components of Cannabis. Currently, CBD generates considerable interest due to its beneficial neuroprotective, antiepileptic, anxiolytic, antipsychotic, and anti-inflammatory properties. Therefore, the CBD scaffold becomes of increasing interest for medicinal chemists. This review provides an overview of the chemical structure of natural and synthetic CBD derivatives including the molecular targets associated with these compounds. A clear identification of their biological targets has been shown to be still very challenging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 381 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 61 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 14%
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Master 32 8%
Other 22 6%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 115 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 61 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 42 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 8%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 126 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,726,504
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#686
of 20,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,733
of 329,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#18
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.