↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive Pathways: Possible Next Steps for Payers in Preparation for Their Potential Implementation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptive Pathways: Possible Next Steps for Payers in Preparation for Their Potential Implementation
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Vella Bonanno, Michael Ermisch, Brian Godman, Antony P. Martin, Jesper Van Den Bergh, Liudmila Bezmelnitsyna, Anna Bucsics, Francis Arickx, Alexander Bybau, Tomasz Bochenek, Marc van de Casteele, Eduardo Diogene, Irene Eriksson, Jurij Fürst, Mohamed Gad, Ieva Greičiūtė-Kuprijanov, Martin van der Graaff, Jolanta Gulbinovic, Jan Jones, Roberta Joppi, Marija Kalaba, Ott Laius, Irene Langner, Ileana Mardare, Vanda Markovic-Pekovic, Einar Magnusson, Oyvind Melien, Dmitry O. Meshkov, Guenka I. Petrova, Gisbert Selke, Catherine Sermet, Steven Simoens, Ad Schuurman, Ricardo Ramos, Jorge Rodrigues, Corinne Zara, Eva Zebedin-Brandl, Alan Haycox

Abstract

Medicines receiving a conditional marketing authorization through Medicines Adaptive Pathways to Patients (MAPPs) will be a challenge for payers. The "introduction" of MAPPs is already seen by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as a fait accompli, with payers not consulted or involved. However, once medicines are approved through MAPPs, they will be evaluated for funding by payers through different activities. These include Health Technology Assessment (HTA) with often immature clinical data and high uncertainty, financial considerations, and negotiations through different types of agreements, which can require monitoring post launch. Payers have experience with new medicines approved through conditional approval, and the fact that MAPPs present additional challenges is a concern from their perspective. There may be some activities where payers can collaborate. The final decisions on whether to reimburse a new medicine via MAPPs will have more variation than for medicines licensed via conventional processes. This is due not only to increasing uncertainty associated with medicines authorized through MAPPs but also differences in legal frameworks between member states. Moreover, if the financial and side-effect burden from the period of conditional approval until granting full marketing authorization is shifted to the post-authorization phase, payers may have to bear such burdens. Collection of robust data during routine clinical use is challenging along with high prices for new medicines during data collection. This paper presents the concept of MAPPs and possible challenges. Concerns and potential ways forward are discussed and a number of recommendations are presented from the perspective of payers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 14%
Researcher 12 13%
Other 7 8%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 37 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 15%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 40 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,616,273
of 22,999,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#987
of 16,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,776
of 317,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#16
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,999,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,305 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.