↓ Skip to main content

Systemic Measures and Legislative and Organizational Frameworks Aimed at Preventing or Mitigating Drug Shortages in 28 European and Western Asian Countries

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic Measures and Legislative and Organizational Frameworks Aimed at Preventing or Mitigating Drug Shortages in 28 European and Western Asian Countries
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2017.00942
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomasz Bochenek, Vafa Abilova, Ali Alkan, Bogdan Asanin, Iñigo de Miguel Beriain, Zeljka Besovic, Patricia Vella Bonanno, Anna Bucsics, Michal Davidescu, Elfi De Weerdt, Natasa Duborija-Kovacevic, Jurij Fürst, Mina Gaga, Elma Gailīte, Jolanta Gulbinovič, Emre U. Gürpınar, Balázs Hankó, Vincent Hargaden, Tor A. Hotvedt, Iris Hoxha, Isabelle Huys, Andras Inotai, Arianit Jakupi, Helena Jenzer, Roberta Joppi, Ott Laius, Marie-Camille Lenormand, Despina Makridaki, Admir Malaj, Kertu Margus, Vanda Marković-Peković, Nenad Miljković, João L. de Miranda, Stanislav Primožič, Dragana Rajinac, David G. Schwartz, Robin Šebesta, Steven Simoens, Juraj Slaby, Ljiljana Sović-Brkičić, Tomas Tesar, Leonidas Tzimis, Ewa Warmińska, Brian Godman

Abstract

Drug shortages have been identified as a public health problem in an increasing number of countries. This can negatively impact on the quality and efficiency of patient care, as well as contribute to increases in the cost of treatment and the workload of health care providers. Shortages also raise ethical and political issues. The scientific evidence on drug shortages is still scarce, but many lessons can be drawn from cross-country analyses. The objective of this study was to characterize, compare, and evaluate the current systemic measures and legislative and organizational frameworks aimed at preventing or mitigating drug shortages within health care systems across a range of European and Western Asian countries. The study design was retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive, and observational. Information was gathered through a survey distributed among senior personnel from ministries of health, state medicines agencies, local health authorities, other health or pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement authorities, health insurance companies and academic institutions, with knowledge of the pharmaceutical markets in the 28 countries studied. Our study found that formal definitions of drug shortages currently exist in only a few countries. The characteristics of drug shortages, including their assortment, duration, frequency, and dynamics, were found to be variable and sometimes difficult to assess. Numerous information hubs were identified. Providing public access to information on drug shortages to the maximum possible extent is a prerequisite for performing more advanced studies on the problem and identifying solutions. Imposing public service obligations, providing the formal possibility to prescribe unlicensed medicines, and temporary bans on parallel exports are widespread measures. A positive finding of our study was the identification of numerous bottom-up initiatives and organizational frameworks aimed at preventing or mitigating drug shortages. The experiences and lessons drawn from these initiatives should be carefully evaluated, monitored, and presented to a wider international audience for careful appraisal. To be able to find solutions to the problem of drug shortages, there is an urgent need to develop a set of agreed definitions for drug shortages, as well as methodologies for their evaluation and monitoring. This is being progressed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 76 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 90 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,259,683
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#862
of 16,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,806
of 443,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#23
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.