↓ Skip to main content

A Novel Circulating miRNA-Based Model Predicts the Response to Tripterysium Glycosides Tablets: Moving Toward Model-Based Precision Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Novel Circulating miRNA-Based Model Predicts the Response to Tripterysium Glycosides Tablets: Moving Toward Model-Based Precision Medicine in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.00378
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanqiong Zhang, Hailong Wang, Xia Mao, Qiuyan Guo, Weijie Li, Xiaoyue Wang, Guangyao Li, Quan Jiang, Na Lin

Abstract

Accumulating clinical evidence show that not all rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients benefit to the same extent from a Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TwHF)-based therapy-Tripterysium glycosides tablets (TG tablets), which emphasizes the need of predictive biomarkers and tools for drug response. Herein, we integrated TG tablets' response-related miRNA and mRNA expression profiles obtained from the clinical cohort-based microarray, miRNA target prediction, miRNA-target gene coexpression, as well as gene-gene interactions, to identify four candidate circulating miRNA biomarkers that were predictive of response to TG tablets. Moreover, we applied the support vector machines (SVM) algorithm to construct the prediction model for the treatment outcome of TG tablets based on the levels of the candidate miRNA biomarkers, and also confirmed its good performance via both 5-fold cross-validation and the independent clinical cohort validations. Collectively, this circulating miRNA-based biomarker model may assist in screening the responsive RA patients to TG tablets and thus potentially benefit individualized therapy of RA in a daily clinical setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,009,334
of 23,088,369 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,344
of 16,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,121
of 330,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#128
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,088,369 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.