You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advancements in Regenerative Strategies Through the Continuum of Burn Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2018.00672 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Randolph Stone, Shanmugasundaram Natesan, Christine J. Kowalczewski, Lauren H. Mangum, Nicholas E. Clay, Ryan M. Clohessy, Anders H. Carlsson, David H. Tassin, Rodney K. Chan, Julie A. Rizzo, Robert J. Christy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 246 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 13% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 104 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 110 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#3,484,692
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,643
of 20,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,855
of 341,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#36
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.