↓ Skip to main content

From Marine Origin to Therapeutics: The Antitumor Potential of Marine Algae-Derived Compounds

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From Marine Origin to Therapeutics: The Antitumor Potential of Marine Algae-Derived Compounds
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2018.00777
Pubmed ID
Authors

Celso Alves, Joana Silva, Susete Pinteus, Helena Gaspar, Maria C. Alpoim, Luis M. Botana, Rui Pedrosa

Abstract

Marine environment has demonstrated to be an interesting source of compounds with uncommon and unique chemical features on which the molecular modeling and chemical synthesis of new drugs can be based with greater efficacy and specificity for the therapeutics. Cancer is a growing public health threat, and despite the advances in biomedical research and technology, there is an urgent need for the development of new anticancer drugs. In this field, it is estimated that more than 60% of commercially available anticancer drugs are natural biomimetic inspired. Among the marine organisms, algae have revealed to be one of the major sources of new compounds of marine origin, including those exhibiting antitumor and cytotoxic potential. These compounds demonstrated ability to mediate specific inhibitory activities on a number of key cellular processes, including apoptosis pathways, angiogenesis, migration and invasion, in both in vitro and in vivo models, revealing their potential to be used as anticancer drugs. This review will focus on the bioactive molecules from algae with antitumor potential, from their origin to their potential uses, with special emphasis to the alga Sphaerococcus coronopifolius as a producer of cytotoxic compounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 300 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 39 13%
Researcher 36 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 108 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 8%
Chemistry 19 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 4%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 125 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,530,891
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,328
of 16,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,629
of 330,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#264
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.