You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of a Primary Epithelial Cell Screening Tool to Investigate Phage Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2018.01330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Trend, Barbara J. Chang, Mark O’Dea, Stephen M. Stick, Anthony Kicic, WAERP, AusREC, AREST CF |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,175,374
of 23,342,664 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,474
of 16,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,096
of 439,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#150
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.