You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making Sense of the Epigenome Using Data Integration Approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.00126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Cazaly, Joseph Saad, Wenyu Wang, Caroline Heckman, Miina Ollikainen, Jing Tang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | 60% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 216 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 19% |
| Researcher | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 71 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 60 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,979,510
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,605
of 20,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,916
of 369,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#174
of 370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.