You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (SNEDDS) for Poorly Water-Soluble Talinolol: Preparation, in vitro and in vivo Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.00459 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohsin Kazi, Mohammed Al-Swairi, Ajaz Ahmad, Mohammad Raish, Fars K. Alanazi, Mohamed M. Badran, Azmat Ali Khan, Amer M. Alanazi, Muhammad Delwar Hussain |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 197 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 94 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 61 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 97 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,681,024
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,486
of 16,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,148
of 350,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#274
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.