You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a Complex Intervention to Improve Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication in Older People Using an Anthropomorphic Virtual Assistant Software
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.00680 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isa Brito Félix, Mara Pereira Guerreiro, Afonso Cavaco, Ana Paula Cláudio, Anabela Mendes, João Balsa, Maria Beatriz Carmo, Nuno Pimenta, Adriana Henriques |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 53 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 64 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,594,029
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,379
of 16,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,687
of 352,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#128
of 343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.