You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors and Situations Affecting the Value of Patient Preference Studies: Semi-Structured Interviews in Europe and the US
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chiara Whichello, Eline van Overbeeke, Rosanne Janssens, Karin Schölin Bywall, Selena Russo, Jorien Veldwijk, Irina Cleemput, Juhaeri Juhaeri, Bennett Levitan, Jürgen Kübler, Meredith Smith, Richard Hermann, Matthias Englbrecht, Axel J. Hueber, Alina Comanescu, Sarah Harding, Steven Simoens, Isabelle Huys, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
| Greece | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 10% |
| Sweden | 2 | 10% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 26 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,690,057
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,159
of 20,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,665
of 356,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#43
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.