You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Herbal Medicine for Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01139 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui-Lin Wang, Hua Zeng, Meng-Bei Xu, Xiao-Li Zhou, Pei-Qing Rong, Ting-Yu Jin, Qi Wang, Guo-Qing Zheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Austria | 2 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#4,537,057
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,945
of 16,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,431
of 352,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#81
of 429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.