You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity in Head and Neck Cancer: From Identification to Management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01254 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haiyang Wang, Abdulkadir Mustafa, Shixi Liu, Jun Liu, Dan Lv, Hui Yang, Jian Zou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 10% |
| Austria | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,421,861
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,004
of 19,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,480
of 367,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#42
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.