You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Red Yeast Rice: A Systematic Review of the Traditional Uses, Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Quality Control of an Important Chinese Folk Medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01449 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Zhu, Fangyuan Qi, Jianjun Wu, Guoqing Yin, Jinwei Hua, Qiaoyan Zhang, Luping Qin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 7% |
| Austria | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 85 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,494,298
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#568
of 20,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,484
of 481,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#11
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 481,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.