You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improved Computational Identification of Drug Response Using Optical Measurements of Human Stem Cell Derived Cardiomyocytes in Microphysiological Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01648 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karoline Horgmo Jæger, Verena Charwat, Bérénice Charrez, Henrik Finsberg, Mary M. Maleckar, Samuel Wall, Kevin E. Healy, Aslak Tveito |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 7 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#18,054,454
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#7,320
of 16,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,466
of 456,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#246
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.