You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Updated Review of Randomized Clinical Trials Testing the Improvement of Cognitive Function of Ginkgo biloba Extract in Healthy People and Alzheimer’s Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2019.01688 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haolong Liu, Min Ye, Hongzhu Guo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#790,102
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#301
of 20,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,665
of 386,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10
of 531 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 531 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.