You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommendation of Antimicrobial Dosing Optimization During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2020.00786 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lu Li, Xin Li, Yanzhe Xia, Yanqi Chu, Haili Zhong, Jia Li, Pei Liang, Yishan Bu, Rui Zhao, Yun Liao, Ping Yang, Xiaoyang Lu, Saiping Jiang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 36% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 31 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 47 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,793,597
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#681
of 17,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,264
of 400,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#20
of 496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.