↓ Skip to main content

Comparative Efficacy of Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Interventions for Acne Vulgaris: A Network Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative Efficacy of Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Interventions for Acne Vulgaris: A Network Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2020.592075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qingyang Shi, Lizi Tan, Zhe Chen, Long Ge, Xiaoyan Zhang, Fengwen Yang, Chunxiang Liu, Junhua Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Unspecified 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,664,059
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#5,278
of 19,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,417
of 523,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#145
of 419 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 419 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.