↓ Skip to main content

Fever and Antipyretic Supported by Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Multi-Pathway Regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fever and Antipyretic Supported by Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Multi-Pathway Regulation
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2021.583279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Le-Le Ma, Hui-Min Liu, Chuan-Hong Luo, Ya-Nan He, Fang Wang, Hao-Zhou Huang, Li Han, Ming Yang, Run-Chun Xu, Ding-Kun Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Unspecified 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 24 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Unspecified 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#15,681,103
of 23,302,246 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6,710
of 16,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,814
of 428,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#313
of 713 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,302,246 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 713 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.