You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacological Interventions for Covid-19: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2021.649472 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franco De Crescenzo, Laura Amato, Fabio Cruciani, Luke P Moynihan, Gian Loreto D’Alò, Simona Vecchi, Rosella Saulle, Zuzana Mitrova, Valeria Di Franco, Antonio Addis, Marina Davoli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 7 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 70 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,111,850
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,317
of 16,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,732
of 436,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#95
of 894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.