You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
He-Jie-Shen-Shi Decoction as an Adjuvant Therapy on Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort and Potential Mechanistic Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2021.700498 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Haibo Hu, Kun Wang, Li Wang, Yanjun Du, Juan Chen, Yongchun Li, Chuanbo Fan, Ning Li, Ying Sun, Shenghao Tu, Xuechao Lu, Zhaoshan Zhou, Huantian Cui |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Philippines | 1 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,730,841
of 23,590,588 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#4,984
of 17,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,161
of 448,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#224
of 932 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,590,588 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 932 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.