↓ Skip to main content

An In-Silico, In-Vitro and In-Vivo Combined Approach to Identify NMNATs as Potential Protein Targets of ProEGCG for Treatment of Endometriosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An In-Silico, In-Vitro and In-Vivo Combined Approach to Identify NMNATs as Potential Protein Targets of ProEGCG for Treatment of Endometriosis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2021.714790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sze Wan Hung, Bo Liang, Yating Gao, Ruizhe Zhang, Zhouyurong Tan, Tao Zhang, Pui Wah Jacqueline Chung, Tak Hang Chan, Chi Chiu Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Unspecified 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,800,225
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,579
of 16,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,439
of 434,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#641
of 1,092 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,092 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.