You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Prophylactic Use of Intranasal Oil Formulations in the Hamster Model of COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2021.746729 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zaigham Abbas Rizvi, Manas Ranjan Tripathy, Nishant Sharma, Sandeep Goswami, N Srikanth, J. L. N. Sastry, Shailendra Mani, Milan Surjit, Amit Awasthi, Madhu Dikshit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| India | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#13,339,920
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#3,832
of 17,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,561
of 435,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#199
of 1,092 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,092 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.