↓ Skip to main content

Immunosuppressive Isopimarane Diterpenes From Cultures of the Endophytic Fungus Ilyonectria robusta

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunosuppressive Isopimarane Diterpenes From Cultures of the Endophytic Fungus Ilyonectria robusta
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2021.766441
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ke Ye, Xiao Lv, Xian Zhang, Pan-Pan Wei, Zheng-Hui Li, Hong-Lian Ai, Da-Ke Zhao, Ji-Kai Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#18,607,615
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,415
of 16,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,533
of 505,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#577
of 1,190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,381 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.