↓ Skip to main content

Meta-Analysis of NUDT15 Genetic Polymorphism on Thiopurine-Induced Myelosuppression in Asian Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-Analysis of NUDT15 Genetic Polymorphism on Thiopurine-Induced Myelosuppression in Asian Populations
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2021.784712
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kanyarat Khaeso, Sariya Udayachalerm, Patcharee Komvilaisak, Su-on Chainansamit, Kunanya Suwannaying, Napat Laoaroon, Pitchayanan Kuwatjanakul, Nontaya Nakkam, Chonlaphat Sukasem, Apichaya Puangpetch, Wichittra Tassaneeyakul, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#6,199,713
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#2,518
of 17,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,115
of 517,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#169
of 1,124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.