You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Best Practice in the chemical characterisation of extracts used in pharmacological and toxicological research—The ConPhyMP—Guidelines 1 2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2022.953205 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Heinrich, Banaz Jalil, Mona Abdel-Tawab, Javier Echeverria, Žarko Kulić, Lyndy J. McGaw, John M. Pezzuto, Olivier Potterat, Jia-Bo Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Uganda | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 66% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,685,577
of 25,097,836 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#662
of 19,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,965
of 425,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#31
of 1,535 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,097,836 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,535 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.