You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pharmacological activities and effective substances of the component-based Chinese medicine of Ginkgo biloba leaves based on serum pharmacochemistry, metabonomics and network pharmacology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphar.2023.1151447 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hongbao Liang, Jingchun Yao, Yu Miao, Ying Sun, Yanbing Gao, Chenghong Sun, Rui Li, He Xiao, Qun Feng, Guofei Qin, Xiaoyan Lu, Zhong Liu, Guimin Zhang, Feng Li, Mingguo Shao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,886,375
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,797
of 17,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,412
of 336,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#480
of 783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.