↓ Skip to main content

The participation of clinical pharmacists in the treatment of patients with central nervous system infection can improve the effectiveness and appropriateness of anti-infective treatments: a…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The participation of clinical pharmacists in the treatment of patients with central nervous system infection can improve the effectiveness and appropriateness of anti-infective treatments: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2023.1226333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jie Cheng, ChuanDong Dang, Xiao Li, JianJun Wang, Xin Huang, Yan Li, XueYan Cui

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#21,866,241
of 24,396,012 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#11,703
of 18,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,467
of 165,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#200
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,396,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.