↓ Skip to main content

Protective effects and mechanism of curcumin in animal models of pulmonary fibrosis: a preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective effects and mechanism of curcumin in animal models of pulmonary fibrosis: a preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2023.1258885
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fang Hanyu, Hong Zheng, Wang Jiaqi, Dong Tairan, Zhao Yiyuanzi, Yang Qiwen, Liu Ying, Zhang Hongchun, Liu Lu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#19,398,339
of 24,707,218 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,105
of 18,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,226
of 230,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#70
of 453 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,707,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 453 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.