↓ Skip to main content

Different biologics for biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different biologics for biological-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1279525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jixia Lin, Yougang Ren

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,782,945
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#1,893
of 19,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,643
of 262,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#6
of 523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.