↓ Skip to main content

Ferroptosis: a new mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine for cancer treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ferroptosis: a new mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine for cancer treatment
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1290120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiahao Zhu, Peipei Shen, Yu Xu, Xiaojun Zhang, Qingqing Chen, Ke Gu, Shengjun Ji, Bo Yang, Yutian Zhao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,024,592
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#10,011
of 20,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,263
of 353,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#183
of 682 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 682 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.