↓ Skip to main content

Evidence mapping of traditional Chinese medicine in diabetic peripheral neuropathy treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence mapping of traditional Chinese medicine in diabetic peripheral neuropathy treatment
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1325607
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yujie Fu, Yiming Wang, Zhenghong Li, Ke Huang, Yating Gao, Shanqiong Xu, Qingna Li, Xingfang Liu, Guangde Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,945,287
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#12,481
of 19,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,422
of 158,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#105
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.