↓ Skip to main content

Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators and activators: new horizons in the treatment of priapism associated with sickle cell disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators and activators: new horizons in the treatment of priapism associated with sickle cell disease
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1357176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dalila Andrade Pereira, Tammyris Helena Rebecchi Silveira, Fabiano Beraldi Calmasini, Fábio Henrique Silva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#22,703,218
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#12,313
of 19,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,762
of 157,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#93
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.