↓ Skip to main content

Bioinformatics identifies key genes and potential drugs for energy metabolism disorders in heart failure with dilated cardiomyopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioinformatics identifies key genes and potential drugs for energy metabolism disorders in heart failure with dilated cardiomyopathy
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1367848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haixia Wang, Peifeng Cai, Xiaohan Yu, Shiqi Li, Wei Zhu, Yuntao Liu, Dawei Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#19,985,199
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,489
of 19,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,493
of 154,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#55
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.