↓ Skip to main content

Post-marketing safety evaluation of lurbinectedin: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-marketing safety evaluation of lurbinectedin: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FAERS database
Published in
Frontiers in Pharmacology, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2024.1368763
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhao Li, Changying Guo, Xingfei Liu, Zhengzhou Qiu, Ruilin Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,037,923
of 25,492,047 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#8,492
of 19,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,925
of 164,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pharmacology
#51
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,492,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.