You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mathematical modeling of complex contagion on clustered networks
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physics, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphy.2015.00071 |
Authors |
David J. P. O'Sullivan, Gary J. O'Keeffe, Peter G. Fennell, James P. Gleeson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 19% |
Ireland | 6 | 16% |
Spain | 5 | 14% |
Switzerland | 3 | 8% |
France | 2 | 5% |
Finland | 2 | 5% |
Belgium | 2 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 20 | 54% |
Members of the public | 15 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 33% |
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 22% |
Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 19% |
Mathematics | 7 | 13% |
Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
Engineering | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,533,326
of 24,742,536 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#58
of 4,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,962
of 274,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,742,536 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,282 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.