↓ Skip to main content

Clinically Valuable Quality Control for PET/MRI Systems: Consensus Recommendation From the HYBRID Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physics, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinically Valuable Quality Control for PET/MRI Systems: Consensus Recommendation From the HYBRID Consortium
Published in
Frontiers in Physics, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fphy.2019.00136
Authors

Alejandra Valladares, Sahar Ahangari, Thomas Beyer, Ronald Boellaard, Zacharias Chalampalakis, Claude Comtat, Laura DalToso, Adam E. Hansen, Michel Koole, Jane Mackewn, Paul Marsden, Johan Nuyts, Francesco Padormo, Ronald Peeters, Sebastian Poth, Esteban Solari, Ivo Rausch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Engineering 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,705,209
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#100
of 3,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,945
of 347,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,854 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.