↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Safety Evaluation of Cold Plasma-Activated Liquid in Rabbits

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physics, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Safety Evaluation of Cold Plasma-Activated Liquid in Rabbits
Published in
Frontiers in Physics, August 2021
DOI 10.3389/fphy.2021.659227
Authors

Yujing Xu, Sansan Peng, Bing Li, Shuai Wang, Hao Zhang, Qiaosong Li, Zhijie Liu, Bo Guo, Dingxin Liu, Dehui Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 14%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Physics and Astronomy 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,148,459
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#182
of 4,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,325
of 424,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#10
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.