You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hybrid weighted communication network node importance evaluation method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physics, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphy.2023.1133250 |
| Authors |
Gan Tian, Xinzhi Yang, Yaxiong Li, Zhengwei Yang, Gong Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#16,668,856
of 25,303,733 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physics
#695
of 4,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,651
of 366,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physics
#10
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,303,733 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,421 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.