You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cortical Gating of Oropharyngeal Sensory Stimuli
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2010.00167 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen Wheeler-Hegland, Teresa Pitts, Paul W. Davenport |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 18% |
Researcher | 4 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 5 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 23% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#5,853,773
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,702
of 13,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,459
of 182,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#7
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.