↓ Skip to main content

The Challenges Facing Systemic Approaches in Biology: An Interview with Kunihiko Kaneko

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Challenges Facing Systemic Approaches in Biology: An Interview with Kunihiko Kaneko
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2011.00093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunihiko Kaneko

Abstract

Interviewed by Kumar Selvarajoo and Masa Tsuchiya at Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Japan, I discuss my approach to biology, what I call complex systems biology. The approach is constructive in nature, and is based on dynamical systems theory and statistical physics. It is intended to understand universal characteristics of life systems; generic adaptation under noise, differentiation from stem cells in interacting cells, robustness and plasticity in evolution, and so forth. Current status and future directions in systems biology in Japan are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Serbia 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 42%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Computer Science 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2015.
All research outputs
#6,850,877
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#3,241
of 13,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,568
of 180,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.