↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular Membrane Vesicles and Immune Regulation in the Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracellular Membrane Vesicles and Immune Regulation in the Brain
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2012.00117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chiara Cossetti, Jayden A. Smith, Nunzio Iraci, Tommaso Leonardi, Clara Alfaro-Cervello, Stefano Pluchino

Abstract

The brain is characterized by a complex and integrated network of interacting cells in which cell-to-cell communication is critical for proper development and function. Initially considered as an immune privileged site, the brain is now regarded as an immune specialized system. Accumulating evidence reveals the presence of immune components in the brain, as well as extensive bidirectional communication that takes place between the nervous and the immune system both under homeostatic and pathological conditions. In recent years the secretion of extracellular membrane vesicles (EMVs) has been described as a new and evolutionary well-conserved mechanism of cell-to-cell communication, with EMVs influencing the microenvironment through the traffic of bioactive molecules that include proteins and nucleic acids, such as DNA, protein coding, and non-coding RNAs. Increasing evidence suggests that EMVs are a promising candidate to study cross-boundary cell-to-cell communication pathways. Herein we review the role of EMVs secreted by neural cells in modulating the immune response(s) within the brain under physiological and pathological circumstances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 18 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2013.
All research outputs
#19,335,004
of 24,620,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#7,874
of 15,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,797
of 253,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#171
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.