↓ Skip to main content

Interpretation of the Consequences of Mutations in Protein Kinases: Combined Use of Bioinformatics and Text Mining

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interpretation of the Consequences of Mutations in Protein Kinases: Combined Use of Bioinformatics and Text Mining
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2012.00323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose M. G. Izarzugaza, Martin Krallinger, Alfonso Valencia

Abstract

Protein kinases play a crucial role in a plethora of significant physiological functions and a number of mutations in this superfamily have been reported in the literature to disrupt protein structure and/or function. Computational and experimental research aims to discover the mechanistic connection between mutations in protein kinases and disease with the final aim of predicting the consequences of mutations on protein function and the subsequent phenotypic alterations. In this article, we will review the possibilities and limitations of current computational methods for the prediction of the pathogenicity of mutations in the protein kinase superfamily. In particular we will focus on the problem of benchmarking the predictions with independent gold standard datasets. We will propose a pipeline for the curation of mutations automatically extracted from the literature. Since many of these mutations are not included in the databases that are commonly used to train the computational methods to predict the pathogenicity of protein kinase mutations we propose them to build a valuable gold standard dataset in the benchmarking of a number of these predictors. Finally, we will discuss how text mining approaches constitute a powerful tool for the interpretation of the consequences of mutations in the context of disease genome analysis with particular focus on cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Computer Science 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,732,278
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#5,628
of 13,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,230
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#140
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.