↓ Skip to main content

TRP channels: sensors and transducers of gasotransmitter signals

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TRP channels: sensors and transducers of gasotransmitter signals
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2012.00324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nobuaki Takahashi, Daisuke Kozai, Yasuo Mori

Abstract

The transient receptor potential (trp) gene superfamily encodes cation channels that act as multimodal sensors for a wide variety of stimuli from outside and inside the cell. Upon sensing, they transduce electrical and Ca(2+) signals via their cation channel activities. These functional features of TRP channels allow the body to react and adapt to different forms of environmental changes. Indeed, members of one class of TRP channels have emerged as sensors of gaseous messenger molecules that control various cellular processes. Nitric oxide (NO), a vasoactive gaseous molecule, regulates TRP channels directly via cysteine (Cys) S-nitrosylation or indirectly via cyclic GMP (cGMP)/protein kinase G (PKG)-dependent phosphorylation. Recent studies have revealed that changes in the availability of molecular oxygen (O(2)) also control the activation of TRP channels. Anoxia induced by O(2)-glucose deprivation and severe hypoxia (1% O(2)) activates TRPM7 and TRPC6, respectively, whereas TRPA1 has recently been identified as a novel sensor of hyperoxia and mild hypoxia (15% O(2)) in vagal and sensory neurons. TRPA1 also detects other gaseous molecules such as hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S) and carbon dioxide (CO(2)). In this review, we focus on how signaling by gaseous molecules is sensed and integrated by TRP channels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 118 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Master 15 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 16 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 13%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Chemistry 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 18 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2012.
All research outputs
#13,669,726
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#4,799
of 13,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,077
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#118
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.