↓ Skip to main content

pCO2 and pH regulation of cerebral blood flow

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
pCO2 and pH regulation of cerebral blood flow
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2012.00365
Pubmed ID
Authors

SeongHun Yoon, Mario Zuccarello, Robert M. Rapoport

Abstract

CO(2) serves as one of the fundamental regulators of cerebral blood flow (CBF). It is widely considered that this regulation occurs through pCO(2)-driven changes in pH of the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), with elevated and lowered pH causing direct relaxation and contraction of the smooth muscle, respectively. However, some findings also suggest that pCO(2) acts independently of and/or in conjunction with altered pH. This action may be due to a direct effect of CSF pCO(2) on the smooth muscle as well as on the endothelium, nerves, and astrocytes. Findings may also point to an action of arterial pCO(2) on the endothelium to regulate smooth muscle contractility. Thus, the effects of pH and pCO(2) may be influenced by the absence/presence of different cell types in the various experimental preparations. Results may also be influenced by experimental parameters including myogenic tone as well as solutions containing significantly altered HCO(3) (-) concentrations, i.e., solutions routinely employed to differentiate the effects of pH from pCO(2). In sum, it appears that pCO(2), independently and in conjunction with pH, may regulate CBF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Master 19 12%
Other 9 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 14%
Neuroscience 17 11%
Engineering 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,524,175
of 24,022,746 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#1,943
of 14,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,213
of 250,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#38
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,022,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.