↓ Skip to main content

The LF/HF ratio does not accurately measure cardiac sympatho-vagal balance

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
928 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
989 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The LF/HF ratio does not accurately measure cardiac sympatho-vagal balance
Published in
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fphys.2013.00026
Pubmed ID
Authors

George E. Billman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 989 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 966 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 167 17%
Student > Master 153 15%
Researcher 113 11%
Student > Bachelor 111 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 65 7%
Other 181 18%
Unknown 199 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 181 18%
Psychology 136 14%
Engineering 100 10%
Neuroscience 70 7%
Sports and Recreations 70 7%
Other 185 19%
Unknown 247 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,995,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,541
of 15,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,554
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#76
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.