You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees: questioning the ecological relevance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Physiology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fphys.2013.00037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Guez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,514,232
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Physiology
#2,974
of 15,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,448
of 291,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Physiology
#90
of 398 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 398 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.